How Bulldozers Became a Symbol of Anti-Muslim Hate in India
Over the past week, Nuh, a small, poor town in the northern state of Haryana, has become a heaped pile of rock and debris after authorities demolished hundreds of homes and shops with bulldozers. Many of the trampled buildings belonged to Muslims, who form 77% of the district’s local population, according to India's 2011 census.
The demolition drive followed violent clashes between Hindus and Muslims on July 31 and continued over three days, killing at least six people and injuring several others. They began when Nuh’s Muslim residents began pelting stones at a hardline Hindu group passing through town during a religious procession, provoked by rumors that a notorious Hindu vigilante would be in attendance. The situation escalated into street riots, with angry mobs from both communities vandalizing property and torching cars before authorities intervened.
Civil society groups say the demolition drive in Nuh is just one example among many of how bulldozers have become a major extrajudicial tool wielded by politicians from the ruling Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to destroy homes, businesses, and places of worship of thousands of Muslims.
An elderly man walks in an area deserted after communal clashes in Nuh, Haryana state, India, on Aug. 1.
Altaf Qadri—AP
Relatives of Abhishek, who was killed in communal clashes, carry his body on a stretcher at a hospital in Nuh, Haryana state, on Aug. 1.
Altaf Qadri—AP
“The bulldozer is a way for the BJP to circumvent the law and institutions in order to realize its [Hindu-nationalist] goals,” says Ali Khan Mahmudabad, a political scientist at Ashoka University in Delhi.
In many BJP-governed states, especially in northern India, demolition drives have not only become a common tactic to quash Muslim dissent, but bulldozers have evolved as a Hindu-nationalist symbol. They feature during election victories, in parade floats in both India and abroad, on packets of chips, and in several Hindu nationalist anthems. Young men have even gotten the symbol tattooed on their arms in celebration of the BJP.
“In a sense, it’s also a symbol of what BJP supporters call ‘quick justice’,” says Mahmudabad.
In Nuh, the bulldozers got to work after Haryana’s Home Minister, Anil Vij, said on Aug. 3 that “the bulldozer could also be part of the remedial action” against those involved in the violence. Authorities later said the shanties and cement structures were built illegally, a charge that many residents deny. On Monday, the high court of Punjab and Haryana halted the demolitions and questioned whether the BJP government, through its use of bulldozers, was conducting “an exercise of ethnic cleansing” of Nuh’s Muslims.
“It's one of the only instances where a court has stepped in to say this wrong,” says Asim Ali, a political researcher at the Centre for Policy Research in Delhi. “Which goes to show how institutions have not been able to step in to rein in the ruling party’s breaches.”
Demonstrators hold placards against the demolition of the house of activist Afreen Fatima and her father Javed Mohammad on June 13, 2022 in Delhi.
Ajay Aggarwal—Hindustan Times/Getty Images
The history of bulldozing
The most high-profile bulldozer case in India occurred when the Babri Masjid, a Mughal-era mosque in the city of Ayodhya, was reduced to rubble in 1992 by Hindu nationalists over claims it stood on the site of an ancient Hindu temple. The case polarized the nation for nearly two decades until 2019, when the Supreme Court handed the land over to Hindus for temple construction, while a special criminal court in 2020 acquitted those accused of destroying the mosque.
Experts say the events around Babri Masjid were vital in advancing the careers of many top BJP officials, including the current Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, who played a key role in overseeing the demolition of the mosque and the construction of the new temple.
Many local Hindu nationalist leaders have only embraced bulldozers in the years since. Yogi Adiyanath, a Hindu cleric and the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, has even earned the nickname “Bulldozer Baba,” or the “father of the bulldozer."
Read More: Bulldozers Have Razed My Home, and Broken the Back of India’s Muslims. Does the World Care?
And the number of demolitions appears to be growing. They also continue to be wielded during highly contentious moments, like the 2019 protests against the controversial citizenship law that rights groups say discriminates against Muslims, and last April, when local authorities defied a high court order to bulldoze another ancient mosque in Uttar Pradesh.
A bulldozer is demolishing an alleged illegal structure of a Bengali market mosque during an anti-encroachment drive by the New Delhi Municipal Corporation (NDMC) on April 11.
Salman Ali—Hindustan Times/Getty Images
There is no official government data on the total number of demolitions over the years, but researchers have tried to tally them up. The Housing and Land Rights Network in Delhi estimates that the government demolished at least 43,000 homes and evicted about 21 people every hour from March 2020 to July 2021, according to the most recent data they have published.
A disregard for the law
Anmol Gupta, a lawyer at Land Conflict Watch, another independent network of researchers studying bulldozing, points out that in many instances, the use of them has usually been in defiance of the law. Notifying evictees in advance is a legal prerequisite to eviction or demolition, and a basic right protected under the Indian Constitution.
“This means that evictees have a chance to contest the proceedings if they want to and gives them an opportunity to be heard,” she tells TIME. “By not following the due process of law, the evictions are violating key rights under the constitution.”
In the case of Nuh, Punjab and Haryana’s high court said that the violation of both procedural and fundamental rights set a precedent for dispensing instant mob justice with bulldozers. But this was a rare judgment, considering that last July, the Supreme Court toed the government’s line on demolitions when hearing a case to halt them in Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, and Maharashtra. The court also declined to put a blanket stay on the demolition drives, arguing that municipal authorities should have jurisdiction over “unauthorized” constructions.
But Ashoka University’s Mahmudabad says that even where a court might intervene, “a lot has already been destroyed by the time an order stays the demolition.”
For far too many Muslims, he adds, “The damage has already been done.”
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Monday defended his government's bulldozer action against criminals and the mafia in the state, and asserted that if anyone created any obstacles in the path of development, action should be taken soon.
Speaking on ANI Podcast with Editor Smita Prakash, Adityanath said that bulldozers and modern machines are required for developing the state.
"If a huge state like Uttar Pradesh should be developed rapidly, do we need shovels and spades in today's era? Earlier, if any work was approved, then the mafia used to come and grab illegal property. Previous governments did not dare take action against the mafia," he said.
advertisement
Asked why his government was demolishing houses of criminals with bulldozers, the Chief Minister replied, "Should I do aarti of those who have illegally grabbed government property? The people of Uttar Pradesh want action against criminals and the mafia."
ALSO READ | 'If we call it (Gyanvapi) mosque, then there will be dispute': Yogi Adityanath
#WATCH | "...Should I do 'aarti' of those who have illegally grabbed government property? The people of UP want action against criminals and mafia...," says UP CM Yogi Adityanath on bulldozer action against criminals & mafia in the state. pic.twitter.com/6OpA8WvDsS — ANI (@ANI) July 31, 2023
He also refuted allegations that his government was solely targeting criminals belonging to minority communities.
"Let a single, innocent Muslim come and tell me that I am facing injustice. And after all, the court is there for all of them."
Adityanath further said the rule of law was equal to everyone, irrespective of religion and security should be guaranteed to the people of the state.
'PEOPLE SHOULD HOLD NATION FIRST, NOT RELIGION'
On a question regarding linking religion with Vande Mataram, Adityanath said that the country will be run as per the Constitution and not dictated by any religion or opinion.
#WATCH | If someone has to live in this country, then they have to hold the nation above anything else, not their religion or opinion, says UP CM Yogi Adityanath. pic.twitter.com/bhe9NIuJWa — ANI (@ANI) July 31, 2023
"Your religion and your opinion will be in your own way, in your own houses, in your places of worship and not creating ruckus publicly on roads. If someone has to live in this country, then they have to hold the nation above anything else, not their religion or opinion. Nation first," he said.
'NO RIOTS, CURFEW IN PAST SIX YEARS'
Responding to a question on criticism of his Hindutva image, Adityanath asserted that no riots and curfews had been imposed in the past six years since the BJP government came to power in the state.
He said all festivals were celebrated peacefully.
#WATCH | "I have been CM for over 6 years now. There have been no riots in the state since 2017. No curfew was imposed in the past 6 years and all festivals were celebrated peacefully.â€æWe did not resort to pretence or hypocrisy. Everybody has the right to fight elections, & ifâ€æ pic.twitter.com/zacrmYS1f1 — ANI (@ANI) July 31, 2023
advertisement
The Chief Minister compared the situation of his state when panchayat polls and Assembly elections were held without any untoward incidents with that of West Bengal, where massive violence rocked the rural polls last month.
"Trinamool Congress (TMC) wants to make the country West Bengal. We all saw what the situation was there. Opposition party workers were killed there. How could they have functioned there due to the violence," he said.
Adityanath said every individual has the democratic right to contest the polls. He stated that if an opponent candidate has the potential and capability of winning an election, he or she should deserve to win.
"If they are capable, they will win. If we are capable, we will win. If we are not, we will lose. If the person is an opponent and capable of winning, he should win. This is a democratic right. We cannot deprive him of her of this," he said.
ALSO READ | Demo-crazy: Why West Bengal sees blood and fire even in panchayat polls
Published By:
Prateek Chakraborty
Published On:
Aug 1, 2023